Trump, the Deep State Junta, and the Mysterious Motives for Regime Change in the Middle East

Globalists, both for and against Trump, are working to steer his foreign policy into the Middle East region and Syria specifically, and they are using the classic tactic of problem-reaction-solution to do so.

With rising geopolitical tensions from North Korean missile tests, direct threats from a desperate EU President Juncker, endless Russian conspiracy theories, and open calls for sedition among Washington swamp rats, the all-out war between President Trump and Globalists foreign and domestic finally came to a head when the administration may have used, you guessed it, a false flag operation to justify a tomahawk missile strike against Assad’s forces.

The pure geopolitical expediencies of such a move are apparent. Yes, it’s a show of force and a demonstration of political brinkmanship responding to aggression from North Korea, the seemingly ambivalent Chinese, and the ravings of the hysterical Juncker. And yes, it also helps to cast doubt on the Russian collusion conspiracy theory that the left peddles, as Russia has been trying to break out of post-World War II containment, into the Middle East, and finally into resource-rich Africa. Syria and Iran have been client states of the Russians since the Soviet era expressly for this purpose.

But maybe more importantly, the Trump administration is reasserting the US’s intent to serve as the primary guarantor of security for the region, a role which was relinquished by the US during the Obama administration’s failure to enforce their own red line policy. That role is now entrusted to the Russians, who began drawing up lucrative energy development and European pipeline agreements with Middle Eastern nations who had rejected the destabilization of Hillary Clinton’s “Arab Spring” operations in places like Libya, Egypt and Syria.

But one question still remains: was striking Syria worth the political cost? and the unwavering support of Trump’s voter base? Is this really a course of action that the President would have himself formulated? And why would the Trump administration choose to respond to growing tensions with action in the Middle East? Why not stage a false flag in the Ukraine? or in the South China Sea to address the Globalists directly? What is this long-running, Globalist fixation with interventionism and regime change in the Middle East? And most importantly, why would the Globalists precipitate Trump’s brinkmanship, and praise him when he prevails over them?

Report: Soros-Linked Group Behind Chemical Attack in Syria

I believe Globalists, both for and against Trump, are working to steer his foreign policy into the Middle East region and Syria specifically, and they are using the classic tactic of problem-reaction-solution to do so. Trump finds himself between a rock and a hard place, Trumps authorizes his military to carry out an unpopular missile strike, and then Trump’s approval rating mysteriously shoots up to 50% and the fake media suddenly start praising him? This is classic Pavlovian stimulus-response conditioning, or pressure from above and pressure from below to use the proper Gnostic terminology. Neocon warhawks are already calling for full-scale invasions, and H.R. McMaster has already made plans to insert 150,000 soldiers into the country.

…the New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, Wall Street Journal and New York Daily News—offered no opinion space to anyone opposed to Donald Trump’s Thursday night airstrikes. By contrast, the five papers ran a total of 18 op-eds, columns or “news analysis” articles (dressed-up opinion pieces) that either praised the strikes or criticized them for not being harsh enough…

Five Top Papers Run 18 Opinion Pieces Praising Syria Strikes–Zero Are Critical

But we still have the question of what do the Globalists want from the Middle East? To answer this question, we must go to Iraq, back to the aftermath of the Iraq War invasion and the beginning of the occupation. At the time, Operation Iraqi Freedom was viewed largely as a success, but there was one glaring failure that even the media could not overlook  – the looting of the National Museum of Iraq located in Baghdad.

Cuneiforms

Those who know of the history of Iraq know that between the Tigris and Euphrates lies the fertile crescent and Mesopotamia, where the world’s first civilizations sprung up from seemingly nothing. While humans across the globe were still hunter-gathering nomads, seemingly fully-developed cultures with knowledge of agriculture, cuneiform writing, basic math and astronomy, two story houses, and a serious emphasis on record keeping and issuing receipts just popped up in places like Sumer, Ur, Babylon, and Akkad.

Considering that most historians had thought cities like Babylon to be a myth until its discovery in 1811 by Claudius Rich, these apparently anachronistic aspects of Mesopotamian cultures have puzzled academics, and no satisfactory answer has been given to try to explain this second “great leap forward” in human history. But the speculation may not be necessary as the Sumerians themselves admit in their creation story, just like the ancient Egyptians and the Zulu tribes of Africa, that they are a legacy civilization spawned from the fall of an older, greater civilization. Of course, this mode of thinking is in direct conflict with the standard Western model of human history, which considers the present period of Globalist feudalism and Orwellian thought control as the height of human progress.

According to the Sumerian texts, the cause of this fall was a sort of family feud among the “Gods,” similar to the quarrels of the Greek pantheon, which turned into a massive war and the destruction and diaspora of that ancient high civilization not unlike Plato’s account of the sinking of Atlantis. The Egyptians and the Zulu have maintained their creation stories via the oral tradition of their own mystery schools, but the Sumerians, with their aptitude toward cuneiform record-keeping, have transcribed that information to protect it from distortion and embellishment.

And it is these cuneiform records, or perhaps what they reveal about early human history and the fall, are what the Globalists are after and have been after for centuries. All of which brings us back to the looting of the National Museum of Iraq. The footage of Iraqi nationals walking away from the smashed museum with whatever they could carry was deemed a travesty, and the US military was heavily criticized for their inability to secure the site. And that became the narrative- that the looting was an unfortunate byproduct of a lack of law and order. But as time passed, more details came to light.

The story of what really happened inside the Iraq Museum when thousands of valuable antiquities were stolen in the immediate aftermath of the 2003 US invasion has been revealed in a new book.

Written by the chief investigator, it says there were three separate thefts, at least one of which was an inside job, another the work of professionals, and a third where fleeing Iraq military had left open a door which let in the looters.

The above-ground storage rooms told a different story. Here was where looters had struck, getting in via a door left open by Iraqi soldiers who, even as they fled, discarded their uniforms in a trail of clothing.

Revealed: the real story behind the great Iraq Museum thefts

One of these thefts resulted in the loss of a collection of 80,000 cuneiform tablets, and unless you think the average Iraqi looking to make a quick buck would skip the fancy vases and ceremonial masks and go straight for the massive cuneiform collection, I suspect that this recorded knowledge was the true goal of these thefts. And I also suspect that these “Iraqi soldiers” who discarded their uniforms may not have been Iraqi soldiers at all.

So who all was involved? It seems that the Globalists in the Bush and Obama administrations were not the only ones interested in this ancient knowledge. The other world power that has consistently demonstrated an interest in Mesopotamia archaeology has been the Germans.

The Germans

In 1902, noted German Assyriologist and linguist Friedrich Delitzsch began sharing through his lectures a shocking discovery he had made during his research of cuneiform tablets. In fact, his work was so provocative, Delitzsch was ordered to present his research before Kaiser Wilhelm and his court. The lecture, titled Babel and Bible, revealed that the proper name of the Jewish god of the Old Testament, Yahweh, had appeared in cuneiform writing during the age of Hammurabi and 300 years before the Israelite’s Exodus from Egypt. Delitzsch also noticed striking similarities between Sumerian creation myths and the Old Testament’s Garden of Eden. He tied the great flood of the Epic of Gilgamesh to the story of Noah’s Ark. According to Delitzsch, the Hebrew Bible, and therefore the Old Testament, was clearly and significantly influenced by Sumerian mythology.

What Delitzsch was discovering was that the Jews had been heavily assimilated to Babylonian culture during their 70 year period of captivity. The practice of monotheism slowly replaced polytheism in Judaism around this time. The introduction of the Hebrew alphabet, along with a new emphasis of referencing the Torah for matters of every day life, appear to be inspired by the Sumerian fixation with record keeping and written language. The cuneiform records were, indeed, telling an interesting story.

It was at this time German foreign policy changed from a sole emphasis on facilitating trade and access to ports, to a policy that included subversion, bribery and propaganda to keep other world powers out of the Middle East. Only four years prior, Kaiser Wilhelm had toured the region, and was advised to back the Pan-Islamism of the slowly unraveling Ottoman Empire. According to the Kaiser’s policy makers, the Ottoman Empire was pushing the Muslim identity and their self-proclaimed status as an Islamic caliphate due to the rebellion of Southern European Christians. The Ottomans wanted to unite the remaining Muslim-majority populace to end the encroachment of Nationalism into their territory.

At first, the Kaiser’s advisors were not interested in saving the Ottomans, they were instead interested in using Pan-Islamism, and later Jihad, to subvert British colonies in India and Egypt as well as French colonies in Morocco and Algeria. But when the German-backed Young Turks came into power in 1908, the stage was set for World War I, and the consequences of the Ottoman alliance turned out to be disastrous for the Germans.

And thus came the Nazis, who would widen the search for ancient knowledge to the Peruvian Andes and Tibet, and also substantially expanded the Kaiser’s policies to include the fomenting of Jihad and terrorism against other Western powers. As soon as Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of Germany in 1933, he met with and formed an alliance with the Sunni Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Amin al-Husseini, who would later lead the Palestinian revolt against the British and actively encourage the extermination of Jews. The Nazis would also form allegiances with the Ba’ath Party, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Young Egypt Movement.

But the Grand Mufti would ultimately fail to spark the Pan-Islamic revolution the Nazis wanted when his rebellion ended in 1939. Undeterred, the Germans continued to back other Pan-Islamists and Arab Nationalist strong men like the Shah of Iran, Said Barre in Somalia, and Ba’athists like Saddam Hussein. But the Pan-Islamic Jihad revolution never materialized, and many of these Pan-Arab regimes just so happened to be the same regimes mentioned in Wesley Clark’s infamous “7 nations in 5 years” remark in March of 2007. And if you’ll recall, the “7 nations” regime change plan was a direct response to the attacks of 9/11.

Covert War

And now we have come full circle, back to the Iraq war of 2003, and the baffling continuation of regime change policy today. Although President Trump claims he will not invade Syria or interfere further with the Middle East, I believe the Globalist splinter group backing Trump will continue that policy against their German Globalist rivals. Whether the fake media will cover their insatiable lust for hidden knowledge and lost secrets is extremely doubtful.

You may have noticed Neocon warhawks like H.R. McMaster and Dina Powell taking power in the National Security Council, but President Trump’s choice for Director of National Intelligence, Dan Coats, is particularly telling. According to Wikipedia:

From August 15, 2001, to February 28, 2005, Coats was the United States Ambassador to Germany.[19][20] As ambassador during the lead-up to the Iraq war, he pressured the German government not to oppose the war, threatening worsened US relations with Germany.[21] As Ambassador he also played a critical role in establishing robust relations with then opposition leader Angela Merkel and in the construction of a new United States Embassy in the heart of Berlin next to the Brandenburg Gate.[22]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Coats

And note that the Berlin embassy Coats helped build was revealed by Edward Snowden in 2013 to be the same embassy that facilitated British and American spying on Angela Merkel’s personal phone.

So I am forced to speculate that there is indeed a covert war between German and American Globalists in the Middle East, but exactly what they are after remains murky. Could it be an ancient story of the origins of humanity? Or occulted knowledge providing insight into the mysterious structures of the universe? Could it be forbidden technology? Could it be all of these things?

Whatever it is, American Globalists have been using Arab Spring operations and ISIS cutouts to continue their pillaging of ancient sites and antiquities in other regime change nations like Egypt, Libya, and Syria.

Pictures: Looters Shatter Museum of Ancient Egyptian Treasures

Libya’s cultural heritage ‘being destroyed and plundered by Isis’

Inside the Palmyra museums looted by ISIS: Pictures show wanton destruction carried out by fanatics

And, when the Globalists have what they want, they simply order their ISIS agents to blow up and level whatever ancient site they are assigned to desecrate, thereby depriving anybody else from learning what they had just learned. Because things like culture, history, and art are irrelevant to the Globalists’ insatiable, sociopathic, psychotic desire for power. If President Trump allows these Rockefeller Republican, warhawk Neocons to bog the US down in another big Middle Eastern quagmire, the political consequences in 2020 may be insurmountable, and the era of Globalist tyranny will continue.

American and Japanese Interests Align in Space

This elitist pipe dream of open borders and world trade under a world bureaucracy has turned out to be the greatest, grandest boondoggle of our time. The world was simply not ready for Globalism.

While the war between the Trump faction and the Globalists rages on in DC, there are huge geopolitical realignments happening in the rest of the world. The era of free trade, Globalism and the highly-centralized, extraterritorial power of multinational corporations has come to an end. This elitist pipe dream of open borders and world trade under a world bureaucracy has turned out to be the greatest, grandest boondoggle of our time. The world was simply not ready for Globalism. In the end, the level of coordination and stability (most notably price stability) required to integrate and form a one world economy was too much for our current state of bureaucracy and technology to handle.

Individual bosses will often blame one-off factors: currency moves, the collapse of Venezuela, a depression in Europe, a crackdown on graft in China, and so on. But the deeper explanation is that both the advantages of scale and those of arbitrage have worn away. Global firms have big overheads; complex supply chains tie up inventory; sprawling organisations are hard to run. Some arbitrage opportunities have been exhausted; wages have risen in China; and most firms have massaged their tax bills as low as they can go. The free flow of information means that competitors can catch up with leads in technology and know-how more easily than they used to.

As a result firms with a domestic focus are winning market share.

The retreat of the global company

Although Globalism is over, the economic/petrodollar war and the oil glut continues as China and Russia will push their BRICS alternative to the US financial hegemony being run out of the Federal Reserve. The latter has suffered two substantial losses in the recent days- the loss of Turkey as a western ally to BRICS, the Chinese and the Russians, and the accession of Japan to the China International Payment System (CIPS).

The ramifications of the loss of Turkey are fairly substantive, as Turkey was a brick in a geopolitical wall the western powers established to keep Russia out of the resource rich middle east and Africa. But Japan’s membership in CIPS may turn out to be just as damaging, if not more so, than the loss of Turkey. CIPS is the primary alternative and competition to SWIFT, the western system of financial institutions and satellite networks that are responsible for securely communicating and clearing financial transactions around the world. That means the Japanese can skip purchasing the reserve currency of US dollars and allow Japanese banks to wire money directly to and from China.

The fact that the Japanese are able to do this without metaphorical, or literal, earth-shattering consequences from the West will be noticed. More and more nations in Asia may choose to opt out of SWIFT and artificially inflating the dollar. This is, without a doubt, a result of the fall of Globalism and the debt-finance model that has ruled America since the early 90’s, but I am 100% sure that the fake media will pin this on the Trump administration. This is a part of the mess that the President says he has inherited.

But the President did secure investment from the Japanese in terms of high-speed rail infrastructure, and the Japanese were even willing to invest $150 billion from their government run pension fund. This is a sign that American and Japanese interests are aligning on a long-term economic basis. The Trump administration has also focused on lowering the price of the F-35 fighter plane, which has overrun its budget by the billions. As Joseph Farrell at Giza Death Star pointed out, the US has been pricing itself out of the international weapons market by failing to reign in budget deficits on developing programs like the F-35. Countries wishing to modernize their military out of a fear of regional instability, countries like Japan, may be interested in such a program.

During the meetings between the President and the Japanese Prime Minister, North Korea performed another test launch of a long-range missile system capable of striking US soil. The two leaders of the US and Japan issued a joint response, condemning the missile test and reaffirming their alliance and coordination against North Korean missile threats. Although issuing such a statement was a pretty standard affair, the implications behind this alliance caught my attention.

If you’re aware of China’s intention to build a continent-spanning electrical grid running on green energy, you may know Japan was the one who proposed this giant infrastructure plan. It’s no secret that the Japanese have been looking to get away from nuclear power, and one project started in 2015 involves sending into orbit a series of satellites covered in solar panels to collect energy directly from the sun. This power would be beamed down to earth in the form of microwaves to a receiving station, a “rectenna,” where it would be converted back into electricity and distributed via Ultra-high-voltage power cables currently under Chinese development.

Meanwhile, JAXA is planning on testing the technology in space by 2018, with a small satellite transmitting several kilowatts from low Earth orbit to a microwave receiver on the ground. JAXA hopes to have a 100 kW satellite in orbit by 2021, and a 200 MW version by 2028. By 2031, if everything goes well, a 1 gigawatt commercial pilot plant will be in operation, with a full on commercial space-based power industry to kick off with one launch per year starting in 2037.

Japan Demoes Wireless Power Transmission for Space-Based Solar Farms

The reason why I mention this in a defense context is that, theoretically, any satellite that can efficiently beam energy to a specific point on earth could also be used as a weapon. A 1978 NASA study found that an older method using longer wavelengths required a rectenna at least 6.2 miles in diameter. That is a huge area of effect for any potential weapon.

But the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) has been experimenting with shorter wavelengths and achieving “pinpoint accuracy.” This sort of accuracy would be much more useful as an anti-missile defense system, and combining this capability with Japan’s proximity to a North Korean launch means that such a device could be quite useful during the short but vulnerable boost phase of a missile launch.

With Globalism dying in a ditch and US and Japanese relations substantially restrengthened, the ball is now in Russia’s court. Putin knows that siding with the Chinese will mean that Russia will always play second fiddle next to the modernized, industrial behemoth of a workforce of the Chinese economy. He understands well the predatory nature of free trade and Mr. Global’s endless scarcity game of debt-financing and austerity, but Russia and China’s interests are already heavily tied together. Judging from Russia’s recent actions and their overarching geopolitical goals, Russia and China will continue to work together in the foreseeable future, but Russia, and Japan, seem to be inching closer and closer to the detente balance of power and away from the Old World Order.

Open War in DC as the Blackmail Networks are Being Unraveled

Right now, the fake media’s job is to focus attention on the President and the Russia conspiracy theory in order to distract from something that is actually real and much, much more damaging.

Although we are less than a month into the Trump administration, the Trump effect has taken hold of Washington. Pundits like Tom Brokaw characterized his victory as “pulling the pin on a hand grenade and rolling it across the country,” and Michael Moore labeled Trump himself a “human Molotov cocktail.” Well the Trump bomb exploded last week, and now we are watching the casualties slowly being evacuated out of DC and the white house.

As a result of Democratic and Globalist obstruction, the white house is still chock full of Globalist stalwarts and holdovers from the Obama administration, and is only partially functioning. Trump’s first act was to pass the immigration order halting refugee flows into the country, but the manner in which the order was executed piqued my interest. Granted, securing the border should be a priority for the administration, particularly if they are planning to destroy ISIS, but the sloppy nature of the roll out was all too predictable given the current state of the white house.

This leads us to the question of why? Why the rushed roll out and all of the compartmentalization that was rumored to be going on? Simply put, Trump is running a diagnostic on his bureaucracy, checking for leaks, and flushing out moles. The immigration order ultimately failed, but the diagnostic was a success. Acting AG and Globalist mole Sally Yates outted herself when she opposed the immigration order and was removed from her position.

The State Department also identified itself as a bastion of Globalism.

This week a State Department “dissent channel” memo surfaced, objecting to President Trump’s Executive Order issued Jan. 27, temporarily suspending travel for 90 days from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. By Friday over 1,000 State Department employees had put their signatures to the resistance statement.

State Dept. Revolts Against Trump For Securing Border

For those who know the history of the Globalists, this is not at all surprising. The 1952 House Select Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations (AKA the Reece Committee) lead by Chief Investigator Norman Dodd found that tax-exempt organizations such as the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, and the Carnegie Endowment were having some very peculiar discussions on topics such as the future (or lack thereof) of the American education system and pushing the US into a war by gaining control of the State Department. 20 years after these meetings were held, Skull and Bones member Henry L. Stimson became Secretary of State under the Hoover administration.

But there are leaks, and potential usurpers, in the system much close to Trump. There are now rumors that the raid in Yemen which killed one Navy SEAL and dozens of civilians may have been compromised by a leak. Apparently, the enemy was notified of the raid before hand, and were prepared to fight the SEALS when they arrived. It’s also rumored that this particular base in Yemen had been targeted for a raid previously, but the Obama administration rejected the plan more than once.

The Trump administration also suffered another loss when National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn was forced to resign after he lied to Vice President Pence about a conversation he had with a Russian Ambassador. There is no proof of any sort of criminality or violation of the Logan Act (that would be Bilderberg), and Flynn was telling the Russians not to overreact to the Obama administration’s sanctions in order to preserve the possibility of a Russian reset and a detente policy. But thanks to the Nazi-collaborators who were heading the CIA at the time, the conversation was leaked, Vice President Pence looked foolish for defending Flynn, and Trump ended up losing an important ally. The President should immediately order an investigation as a government agency illegally wiretapped a (then) private citizen and leaked that conversation to the press in violation of federal laws and civil rights.

It’s also become apparent that the Globalist operatives among the Republicans are now trying to usurp and transform President Trump’s victory into another era of Big Government Republicanism. Powerful members of the GOP establishment are attempting to cut Trump off from the bureaucratic machinery of DC to instill their own corrupt, Globalist agenda of outsourcing, debt-financing, and China first. These operatives in the Republican party are well-known, and records from 2016 show that hedge funds under the control of Nazi-collaborator George Soros had donated to Paul Ryan, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, John McCain, John Kasich, and Lindsey Graham. Notice that these were the most outspoken opponents of Trump during the election season, and some continue to be.

One establishment Republican in particular, White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, is rumored to be on the chopping block for overstepping his bounds and leaking information. With a conflict brewing between the Trump faction and the GOP establishment, the political class who are divided in their usual left-right paradigm, are now fighting against the populists within their own parties. Right now, there is total war in Washington.

Meanwhile, the media mouthpieces are painting this as everything from “palace intrigue” to “chaos” to the beginning of a “meltdown” in their personal speculations. But in all reality, this conflict should have been expected. For a man who doesn’t like to telegraph his intentions, President Trump did just that when he talked about fifth columnists in his comments about the “old architecture” of DC’s buildings having “too many columns” not long after his inauguration. Perhaps the fake news media ignored this, or maybe it went right over their heads.

Right now, the fake media’s job is to focus attention on the President and the Russia conspiracy theory in order to distract from something that is actually real and much, much more damaging. If you’ve been following the controversy around the Pizzagate incident and the allegations of organized pedophilia rings tied to the Washington political establishment, you may have noticed a series of mass arrests being conducted across the globe to round up not just individuals, but whole networks. It started in Norway right after Trump’s victory, but has picked up markedly around the confirmation of Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Massive paedophile ring uncovered by police in Norway after arrest of 51 men

474 Arrested, 28 Sexually Exploited Children Rescued During Statewide Human Trafficking Operation: LASD

Jerry Sandusky’s Son Jeffrey Arrested On Child Sex Abuse Charges

It’s this latest arrest, that of Jeffrey Sandusky, that is probably alarming the Globalists the most as the whole Sandusky scandal has ties to the Franklin Scandal via former Penn State President Graham Spanier, who was Chancellor of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln during the coverup of the pedophila and child porn scandal. The Franklin Scandal was held up as just one part of an international network of human trafficking and child sex slavery using institutions like orphanages and children’s charities. Hiding behind legitimate organizations is only possible through the coordination, and possible funding, of a network.

For this reason, and because of the previous coverups instigated in Nebraska, it is absolutely vital that President Trump use his Department of Justice to finally rip out and destroy this system that has defeated so many private researchers, former police detectives, and even a retired FBI chief. This problem is so deeply rooted and widespread, only action at the federal level will stop this organized rape of children.

If this horrendous, nightmarish aspect of the Washington establishment were to be dragged out into the light of day in court, and the full extent of these blackmail networks could be ascertained, the game is over folks. It’s rumored that these groups are international in scope and include public figures not just in politics, but in the media and entertainment world as well. This is Mr. Global’s Achilles heel, and it’s so important several researchers have been killed to keep the secret. When the networks go, a huge part of the deep state power structure will go, too.

Are Justice Democrats The REAL Resistance? Or Are They Heading Right Into A Trap?

The reality is, the well-intentioned people who have started the Justice Democrats have no idea who they are messing with.

As Democrats languish under Republican control and their loss to an orange billionaire, the internal debate over the future of the party rages on. A Schism is forming between the Corporate Globalist wing of the party and the populist, “Berniecrat” wing. The continuance of Globalist leadership under Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer has rankled the populists, and the debate over who will replace the disgraced duo of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Donna Brazile as chair of the Democratic National Committee has split the Democrats further.

Bernie Sander’s choice of Minnesota Representative Keith Ellison was an ideal pick until Hillary Clinton supporter Haim Saban and the Anti-Defamation League opposed his candidacy, labeling Ellison an anti-Semite. It is ironic, and also sad, to see the ADL smear enemies of the Globalists as anti-Semites and Neo-Nazis while knowing the history and composition of the Globalist faction itself. Rep. Ellison’s rival is Obama Administration Labor Secretary Tom Perez, a representative of the Corporatist status quo who has the endorsement of Vice President Joe Biden.

Obviously, a showdown is looming between the two wings of the party, and many are saying the Democrats are “beyond broken” and a “sinking ship.” Some Democratic voters have expressed interest in going to a third party- the Democratic Socialists. Frankly, the only thing holding the party together is a smoldering, obsessive hatred for President Donald J. Trump, and their dopey “resistance,” which has yet to resist anything.

2714

But there is one group, Justice Democrats, who have decided to start a real resistance, moving to takeover the Democratic party from the corrupt, corporate Establishment working for Mr. Global. Perhaps the Trump faction’s steamrolling and domination over the Republican establishment in this last election season was noticed by some on the left.

The Globalists are now looking at a grim situation. As Trump’s populism has ejected most of their influence from the right, Justice Democrats are threatening to do the same on the left, leaving the “elites” on the outside. Therefore, we should be seeing fierce resistance from the corporate wing, the same resistance we saw during the Senate and House leadership votes that shut out populists like Ohio Representative Tim Ryan. But with Rep. Ellison still in the race, and Chuck Schumer blessing off on his contentious run, that cohered, united resistance against populism is no longer there. So exactly what is going on in the Democratic Party?

To answer that question, we need to look at the big picture, the global picture. I have mentioned in previous posts how the Globalists reacted to European populists like Marine Le Pen with fake populists like Francois Fillon. In Fillon, the French political establishment rolled over on their usual sticking points of multiculturalism and Russian sanctions in order to preserve the economic agenda of Globalist outsourcing and job retraining. It’s an economic message that still hasn’t gone over well in Europe, and the French elections starting in April will speak to the efficacy of Mr. Global’s fake populist candidates. If successful, the Democratic establishment should follow suit and make their own fake populists.

583c46abc361889d328b4585

But the Globalists in DC have two major obstacles preventing them from following this course of action: (1) The vast majority have spent most of their adult lives living in the bubble, being so completely removed from the reality of everyday people and dumbed down that they don’t know how to put together an appealing fake-Populist platform and (2) the Democratic establishment has a credibility problem, and their mainstream media propaganda machines are no longer working.

Taking all of these observations into account, I speculate that the Corporate Democrats may actually be cultivating the populist Justice Democrats movement through actions like Chuck Schumer’s endorsement of Rep. Ellison. As we have seen with the Occupy movement and BLM, the Globalists are always interested in infiltrating and co-opting grassroots movements. As soon as the Justice Democrats or any leftist populist movement gains popularity and legitimacy, Mr. Global will seize it, gut it of its substance, skin it, and wear that skin to parade around as a Justice Democrat to fool the voters who no longer trust the corporate, corrupt Democratic establishment.

The reality is, the well-intentioned people who have started the Justice Democrats have no idea who they are messing with. And I don’t say this to discourage them as I admire their motivations, but I say it to warn them. They will have to resist the gradualism, the seeping incrementalism of corruption, they will have to push back against the calls to be “reasonable,” and often times ignore the group consensus and the offer to compromise. These are not the type of things that Progressives do well, but they are things that President Trump did brilliantly. If inducement or infiltration won’t work, you can bet the Globalists will reach into their bag of dirty tricks to ostracize, slander, blackmail or do much, much worse to remove the true populists from the movement. If we know anything about the Globalists, it’s that they will do anything and everything necessary to maintain their own power.

crackpot

The Immigration Order and Shutting Down the ISIS Ratline

The Saudi and Qatari agents and other Globalist assets working in these jihadist organizations, and probably a proportion of the jihadis themselves, will try to escape the Middle East via these refugee flows, or face death.

In keeping with his campaign promise of “extreme vetting,” the President issued an executive order Friday putting a 90 day halt on refugee resettlement to facilitate the development of a more adequate vetting system. President Trump also negotiated with Saudi Arabia to help establish safe zones in Syria and Yemen.

But of course, the knee-jerk reaction of the Democratic establishment is fueled purely by emotion and rhetoric as a simple review of the facts must be avoided at all costs. Ignore what the dishonest media are calling a “global[ist] backlash” to the “muslim ban” because we’ve known, for nearly a year now, that ISIS agents have been using refugee flows to infiltrate Western countries.

Terrorism Suspects Are Posing as Refugees, Germany Says

A few months later, we learned exactly how ISIS runs this operation.

Tracing the path of four terrorists sent to Europe by the Islamic State

And we now know that jihadis posing as refugees participated in the Paris terror attacks in 2015 and the Berlin truck attack this past Christmas.

So what would be the natural consequence when President Trump proceeds to “knock the hell out of ISIS?” The Saudi and Qatari agents and other Globalist assets working in these jihadist organizations, and probably a proportion of the jihadis themselves, will try to escape the Middle East via these refugee flows, or face death. And the dupes in the Democratic establishment, the dishonest media and their discredited pundits welcome this opportunity for the jihadis. This form of bleeding-heart myopia being encouraged among Progressives is simply an instance of the Dunning-Kruger effect. These bubble dwellers and low-information voters are attracted to the personality-driven politics of clueless pundits, and the vast majority don’t actually take the time to read between the headlines and narratives, flesh out the factions and alliances, and figure out the nuts and bolts of reality.

207151main_vonbraun-kennedy

But it is imperative that one examine this situation quite closely, as the historical parallels are even more chilling. During the aftermath of World War II, ratlines and arrangements like Operation Paperclip and Gehlen Org, were used by Nazi war criminals to escape the trials at Nuremberg. Rather than sitting in a Bavarian jail cell, Nazi leaders were placed in influential positions in sensitive government agencies such as NASA and the CIA while others, disguised as “Catholic immigrants and refugees,” escaped to countries like Argentina, Spain, Paraguay, Colombia, Brazil, Uruguay, Chile, Bolivia, Switzerland, Australia, Canada, Indonesia, and Egypt.

Following the death of Nazism as an ideology, the German industrial conglomerates and the shadowy secret societies responsible for the rise of fascism in Germany, namely the Thule Society, the Teutonic Knights, and all the other weirdo occultists who followed Karl Maria Wiligut, decided to regroup with their newfound friends in the American deep state. It was at that moment, the current Globalist framework of the centralization paradigm, i.e. corporate-lead tyranny, pay-to-play politics, the military-industrial complex, the abrogation of rights for the sake of national security, media control, Racialism as a sociopolitical tool, a hefty dose of perception management AKA Weltanschauungskrieg, and most prominently, the perpetual war against boogeymen such as the Global War on Terror, was formulated. The tactics are almost exactly the same, the fascists have simply rebranded themselves as the Globalists.

It is from these Globalists and their billionaire friends at the banks that we get the so-called “Third Way” politicians such as the Neoliberal Clinton machine and the Neoconservative Bush dynasty, along with their European counterparts at the head of the EU and Germany, who are dealing with their own refugee crisis at this very moment.

And as it just so happens, it was the Nazis who, for decades prior to and during World War II, saw value in fomenting a jihad to eject the British and French out of the Middle East. Hitler’s Arab toady, Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Amin al-Husseini, relished in Hitler’s extermination of the Jews, and in January of 1941, an agreement was made to transfer to the Mufti’s Islamic Volunteers all of the necessary technology and technical knowledge to establish concentration camps in the Middle East.

But the Grand Mufti wanted more. According to Barry Rubin and Wolfgang G. Schwanitz in their excellent book Nazis, Islamists, And The Making Of The Modern Middle East:

But al-Husaini’s ambitions went further. He wanted German backing not only to wipe out the Jews in the Middle East but also to make him ruler over all Arabs. In exchange for Berlin’s backing, he pledged to bring the Muslims and Arabs into an alliance with Germany; spread Nazi ideology; promote German trade; and “wage terror,” in his own words, against the British and French.

The Nazis were eager for this partnership. They established special relationships with the Muslim Brotherhood [emphasis added], the Ba’ath Party, the Young Egypt movement, and radical factions in Syria, Iraq, and Palestine. Berlin also hoped to build links with the kings of Egypt and Saudi Arabia.(Rubin and Schwanitz, 2014, pg. 4)

This specific link to the Muslim Brotherhood is crucial as it represents the fine, golden thread that connects the Fascists’ plans in the Middle East decades ago with today’s debate surrounding Syrian refugee flows. We must remember that it was the Globalist, open borders candidate Hillary Clinton, who had as her closest personal aide Huma Abedin. Abedin’s connections to the Muslim Brotherhood are well known. Her mother, Saleha Abedin, occupies a senior position at the International Islamic Council for Da’wa and Relief, serving with its chairman, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, leader of the Muslim Brotherhood.

After seven decades, the names and the faces might change, but the geopolitical strategy and the overarching goals do not. Terrorism, jihad, and Racialism are still being used by the fascists to bully and shame the people of a country into welcoming the enemy into their homes again, but this time, the rats are jihadis instead of Nazis. With this immigration order, the President is absolutely correct in shutting down another ratline operation being run by the very same post-war Nazis and American Deep State agents that ran the previous one.

Antifas Groups, Performance Art, and the Stink Bomb Putsch

The purpose of these types of activist coalitions is to serve as a catchall for disillusioned Liberal voters leaving the Democratic Party, often times for being too moderate or corrupt.

No sooner had I commented on Donald Trump’s cryptic pinhole camera warning in my last post, Project Veritas released another set of undercover videos exposing #disruptj20 activists discussing various plans to obstruct Trump’s inauguration and cause chaos.

Part I: Undercover investigation exposes groups plotting criminal activity at Trump inauguration

Part II: NEW Investigation Uncovers Plot to Chain the Trains & Shut Down DC During Inauguration

The #disruptj20 group appears to be a motley collection of far-left, socialist, anti-racist, and anarchist activists who have formed the “DC Anti-Fascist Coalition.” But instead of attacking the Globalist fascists, such as the unabashed Nazi-collaborator George Soros, running the Washington establishment and the EU, they have decided to rail against the Globalists’ greatest foe.

And they decided to do it by unleashing an acid active in stink bombs into the National Press Club. They had also planned to pull fire alarms and activate the building’s sprinkler system to send wet occupants outside into winter temperatures.

“Another activist, identified as Luke Kuhn, said during a sit-down at the Comet Ping Pong pizza parlor in Northwest Washington: ‘If you had a pint of butyric acid, I don’t care how big the building is, it is closing.’ Mr. Green responded: ‘And this stuff is very efficient, it’s very, very smelly, and it lasts a long time.’

“Butyric acid is an ingredient commonly used in stink bombs. As a backup plan, activists said in the video they would look to set off the sprinkler system.”

Video shows anti-Trump activists plotting to set off stink bombs, sprinklers at inaugural fetes

This, along with plans to immobilize DC Metro trains with heavy chains, are part of a broader plan to obstruct “major bridges and highway access points” on inauguration day. The FBI is reviewing the entirety of the undercover footage, and those attending the celebrations at the National Press Building have filed for restraining orders and civil action.

Apparently, some of these Antifas activists have been paranoid of infiltration since their first public meeting.

screen-shot-2017-01-17-at-4-44-03-pm

Keep “security culture” in mind? Why use government jargon to talk to your fellow activists?

“Today, security culture is being used to describe the kind of behaviors organizations would like to see in their employees, in areas like cybersecurity, physical security and personnel security. The term is used by government institutions within defense, police and intelligence agencies to explain the focus on security, security training and the need to change an individuals behavior into a behavior that is coherent to the security behaviors determined by the organization.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_culture

When news of the hidden camera footage broke, #disruptj20 responded by claiming that they knew they were being recorded and were trolling Project Veritas in a counter-sting. Wow, what wonderful performance artists! But there are now reports that #disruptj20 activists are backing off their plans to impede traffic to the capitol.

“An activist coalition has dramatically scaled back plans to block the flow of traffic into the nation’s capital on Friday, a key organizer says following the release of undercover videos produced by a conservative group.

“Legba Carrefour, an organizer of the activist network DisruptJ20 shown discussing bridge and train blockades in footage recorded by Project Veritas on Tuesday, says ‘the amount of chaos is being intentionally overstated’ by his group.

“By virtue of us making those claims, it whips people up into the kind of panic that accidentally ends up causing the chaos we want. You can say ‘all of Metro is being blockaded’ and people will stay home,’ the local anarchist says.”

Anti-Trump DisruptJ20 Activists Scale Back Inauguration Blockade Plans

According to Carrefour, exposing these Antifas plots actually has the effect of advancing their agenda. Yes, they meant to do it! In fact, the strength of Carrefour’s performance art is so powerful, #disruptj20 can just skip carrying out their operations and start thanking Carrefour and Kuhn for their incredible performances.

If there is to be an AstroTurfed anti-Trump resistance in the coming years, expect these Antifas movements to near the center of it. In British politics, anti-fascist groups like this popped up after the upheaval of Thatcherism in the late 70’s and throughout the 80’s. After being expelled from the Socialist Workers Party for engaging in street violence with far-right organizations, the militant Red Action group formed in 1981.

Red Action would be the primary supporter of Anti-Fascist Action, a coalition put together from other disenfranchised radical leftists, Trotskyites, class-struggle anarchists and anti-racists- essentially the same ideological composition as the DC Anti-Fascist Coalition. The purpose of these types of activist coalitions is to serve as a catchall for disillusioned Liberal voters leaving the Democratic Party, often times for being too moderate or corrupt. Antifas groups act to corral these voters back into the influence of Globalist ideology and policy after an appalling political failure.

Just as the victory of Margaret Thatcher threw into question the then status-quo of Keynesianism and nationalized industries, Trump’s victory is upsetting Mr. Global’s apple cart today. But Mr. Global still hasn’t updated his tired, old playbook, and now, after more than 30 years, he still has no new answers.

The EU Experiment is Failing… Badly

Facing movements like the 5-Star Party, Marine Le Pen’s National Front, the Dutch Party for Freedom, and many other groups and leaders, the bureaucrats in Brussels have started to panic a little.

Several weeks ago, following the Brexit and other uprisings throughout Southern Europe, I began to question the continued existence of the European Union. A combination of non-elected leadership, years of austerity measures, open borders policies, and Russian sanctions hurting European businesses have inspired the movement to leave the EU.

In Italy, Prime Minister Matteo Renzi’s referendum to amend the constitution has been rejected by the Italian people, and he has resigned his position. The proposal sought to provide stability to the Italian banking system and the government, which has gone through 63 administrations since the fall of Mussolini during World War II. Renzi’s opponents rejected the bill for being poorly drafted and somewhat vague, weakening democratic representation in Parliament, and centralizing power in the cities and away from the provinces.

Although this isn’t explicitly an anti-EU vote, it certainly rejects all of the centralizing, autocratic tendencies of Brussels. Furthermore, most of the votes garnered by these anti-EU movements come from the less-populated rural areas such as the provinces. If anything, it’s more of the same, and the Italians have rejected it.

Not long after the “Renzignation” the value of the euro plummeted.

“The euro was under the gun on Monday, skidding to a 20-month low after Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi said he would resign following a stinging defeat on constitutional reform that could destabilize the country’s shaky banking system.

“Opinion polls show Renzi’s Democratic Party (PD) is neck-and-neck with the 5-Star [Party], which has called for a referendum on Italy’s membership of the euro currency.”

Euro slumps as Renzi vows to quit after Italy referendum loss

Facing movements like the 5-Star Party, Marine Le Pen’s National Front, the Dutch Party for Freedom, and many other groups and leaders, the bureaucrats in Brussels have started to panic a little. This recent article shared by Dr. Joseph Farrell over at Giza Death Star quotes European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker advising European leaders against holding these anti-EU referendums.

“Regarding referenda on EU membership, I think it is not wise to organise this kind of debate, not only because I might be concerned about the final result but because this will pile more controversy onto the huge number already present at the heart of the EU.” – Jean-Claude Juncker

Even Merkel in Germany has begun to soften her stances in response to her party’s drubbing in the last local elections. Formerly a staunch supporter of muslim refugees and multiculturalism, Merkel has now advocated for a burqa ban similar to France. Although I don’t agree with forcing women to cover their heads in public (or barring them from getting an education, income, and driving for that matter), I shudder at the thought of giving the government the power to decide what people can or cannot wear and the duty to enforce such laws with fines or imprisonment if necessary.

The French Establishment’s Answer to Their Trumpian Candidate and a Possible Frexit

Le Pen may be the most dangerous opponent to the EU bureaucrats due to her pedigree, her success in reforming her party’s image, and her push to pass a referendum allowing French citizens to vote to leave the EU.

With the stunning results of the Brexit referendum and the historical upset of a Donald Trump victory, a world-wide movement to reject Globalism and open borders has made their message clear in Europe and have taken the Presidency in America. The next battleground appears to be the French 2017 Presidential elections, with voting set to begin April 23rd.

Although it could be argued that Putin was the first modern leader to stop playing by the Globalist’s rules when he invaded South Ossetia in 2008, Putin has never been a good role model for politicians in the West due to his autocratic nature. On the other hand, Silvio Berlusconi had just won a third term as Prime Minister of Italy in 2008, and many European commentators have been pointing out the similarities between him and Trump since the latter announced his run for President.

“‘The most powerful way to oppose [Berlsuconi], but it was never really done seriously, was to try and understand what his voters want and try to address the need of his voters. No jokes, stop shouting, stop crying, stop saying: ‘It is a horror and disaster’; try and seriously understand what his voters want, and the left was never really successful in doing that,’ [Giovanni] Orsina said.”

If Berlusconi is like Trump, what can America learn from Italy

Berlusconi may have been the prototype for Trump in terms of persona and spectacle, but more importantly, his populist leanings and later Euroscepticism very closely parallel the nationalist tendencies of Trump and the UKIP. It was these populist policies that addressed the needs of the Italian voters and outshone all of his personal flaws.

Over in France, Marine Le Pen leads the National Front party, and supports policies that are openly nationalist and protectionist. Le Pen is not a lippy, spray tanned billionaire like Trump and Berlusconi, her father led the National Front for 40 years and she has been active in politics since 1998. Le Pen may be the most dangerous opponent to the EU bureaucrats due to her pedigree, her success in reforming her party’s image, and her push to pass a referendum allowing French citizens to vote to leave the EU. Yes, she wants a Frexit, just like Britain’s Brexit.

In response to a growing global movement against their policies, and the further potential of a breakup of the EU, the French political Establishment have chosen Francois Fillon to be the Presidential candidate for the Republican party. Fillon served as Prime Minister under Nicolas Sarkozy, an EU Globalist who almost went rogue when sanctions on Russia began to seriously degrade the French economy. Both Sarkozy and Fillon are your typical big government conservatives espousing oligarch-friendly tax cuts while implementing tax-subsidized government welfare and stimulus programs to run up deficits and debts just like George W. Bush.

In an attempt to woo voters away from Le Pen, the Republican party and Fillon has ceded many positions on their platform to populist sentiment. He’s taken a strong stance against Islamic terrorists, favors a reset with Russian relations, and is somewhat socially conservative. But the one area where the bureaucrats in Brussels won’t release their grip is the economy, and Fillon toes the line in this respect. Fillon’s crusade against budget deficits and debt can only mean one thing for an EU country – austerity measures. He has also rejected the protectionist measures of the National Front, insisting instead that French workers embrace job retraining and the offers of employment given to them afterwards.

If that last part about job retraining sounds familiar, it’s because it was a major issue that popped up during the American election. Many inhabitants of the Rust Belt, the region of the country that may have handed Trump the election, suffered under deindustrializing trade deals like NAFTA, and did not want retraining. They wanted to keep their jobs.

“To counter Trump’s populist appeal, [Mahoning County Democratic Party Chairman David] Betras urged Clinton to go vigorously after blue-collar workers by promising to bring back jobs. The key, Betras argued, was to have this message delivered not by politicians but by local blue-collar families in radio and television ads across the region. ‘The messages can’t be about job retraining,’ he wrote. ‘These folks have heard it a million times and, frankly, they think it’s complete and total bullshit.'”

These Rust Belt Democrats Saw the Trump Wave Coming

So why do the Globalists insist on making the same mistake in France? It’s because the EU common market, and the combined economic cooperation of France and Germany, is the only thing keeping the EU and the Euro afloat. Any advice from political pundits and commentators to address the needs of the voters directly will be ignored because it can’t be followed due to geopolitical circumstances and bureaucratic inertia. The current economic paradigm of the “pivot to the East” entails the outsourcing of heavy industry and manufacturing to countries like China, Vietnam, and India in order to build more robust international trade ties and one large, interconnected world economy. Le Pen, and the threat of a Frexit, could undo all of that.

In pursuit of such a system, the EU has rejected national sovereignty, borders, and job security for their people. Anybody with half a brain can see that the Free Trade position is untenable, but the EU bureaucrat bankers and career politicians in Washington, London, and Berlin have been so dependent on public relations, focus grouping, consensus building, sugarcoating their failed policies and painting the leaves green that they have forgotten what is real.

 

The Corporate Bailout of 2016: How the Mainstream Media Will Try Using Social Justice to Save Hillary Clinton from the Rule of Law

Media pundits should recognize their own painfully obvious overestimation of her appeal, but they will instead continue to push race-baiting and sexism and continue to fall on their own swords to protect their corrupt, corporate candidate.

Even after a change in tone from the President-elect and the insistence of President Obama on a peaceful transition of power, media pundits and paid protestors linked to George Soros are still calling for division and the rejection of the 2016 Presidential election result. By actively focusing on Trump’s socially unacceptable, politically incorrect campaign messaging, the Mainstream Media and the Establishment are using their powers of perception management and moral relativism to twist the corrupt Clinton machine’s appalling failure into the great social injustice of a Trump win.

By pushing social justice, they aim to override the rule of law and excuse Hillary Clinton of her corruption, her misconduct and potential criminality, and to create a popular consensus of sympathy that would punish Trump for upholding the law. By painting Hillary as a victim of sexism, racism, the “white lash,” the sinister FBI Director James Comey, or an electoral college created by white slave owners, they are playing on emotions to try to absolve Hillary of accountability for her own actions. They are trying to distract from the fact that she was the reason why the Democrats lost. They are trying to distract from the fact that she cheated Bernie Sanders and his young supporters, who are, and continue to be, the real victims, and who probably would have won.

The first test for the Democratic Party moving forward is whether or not Democrat supporters will allow Wall Street, the Establishment, and their media mouthpieces to bail out Hillary and allow a double standard under the law- one for the oligarchs and another for the people. The reality is, Hillary Clinton should not have been allowed to run in the first place, her loss was a disqualification she brought upon herself.

With all of her baggage, Hillary was the Plague of 2016, getting 10 million less votes than President Obama’s 2008 campaign. Media pundits should recognize their own painfully obvious overestimation of her appeal, but they will instead continue to push race-baiting and sexism and continue to fall on their own swords to protect their corrupt, corporate candidate. The Mainstream Media will paint any attempt by a President Trump to uphold the rule of law as divisive, vindictive, tyrannical, and being a sore winner. But the law must be upheld for everyone to defeat systemic corruption, and the President does not legislate the law.

And the Mainstream Media will claim that they will change, that it was just a mistake, but nobody is listening. They say they are changing as they put in front of you the same talking heads, the same “experts” and Establishment insiders, and more members of the Progressive Honor Brigade to talk down to you and keep you in line. They will never change.

Election 2016 Postmortem: Progressive Honor Brigades Justified the Hidden Trump Vote

It was less about Trump and more about the corrupt, corporatist cronies who cheated Bernie Sanders out of the nomination.

After months of the paid, corporate media’s skewed polls and the bickering of oblivious, elitist pundits, Trump’s underdog victory proved to the world that the people of this country still have the capacity to reject corruption and criminality. Putting aside the utter arrogance of the Establishment elites and their mainstream media mouthpieces, how did the Republicans defy the odds, the polls, and the consensus of the “experts” to win all three houses in 2016?

It’s fairly simple- the Left’s constant negative messaging about bigotry and shaming and a total overestimation of the appeal of Hillary Clinton brought out the the worst of Progressive ideology and depressed any remaining enthusiasm for them. Since Clinton herself had no vision for the country (that was left to her donors) and was already badly exposed by Wikileaks, the Democrat’s sole strategy was to shout down Trump with negativity, with what Catherine Austin Fitts calls the “shriek-o-meter.” Progressive Honor Brigades were making their rounds in the cities, on the campuses and on the news pushing political correctness and thought correctness while silencing critics and dissenters, often from within their own party. Many who agreed with Trump’s economic assessment of the country found themselves being accused of racism and sexism.

Rather than going out and earning the peoples’ vote, Hillary Clinton’s obvious ethical/legal facade and reclusiveness created the perception of a sense of entitlement, of an expectation derived from her own hubris and imperiousness. As Trump attacked the Washington bubble, its liberal inhabitants of Establishment reporters, pundits, and so-called “experts” ignored the warning signs and retreated deeper into their bubble. When the bubble popped on Election day, the hidden Trump vote revealed itself and all of the political insiders and “experts” started blaming the “polling community,” and “media blind spots,” and the electoral college and anything else they can think of as they continue to fall on their swords to protect Hillary.

The oppression of the Left, accusations of bigotry and shaming, and ultimately, Hillary Clinton is what cost the Democrats the election. It was less about Trump and more about the corrupt, corporatist cronies who cheated Bernie Sanders out of the nomination. It was about how the world views our country, not in the context of Trump’s inflammatory comments, but in our ability keep our word and honor a deal. Hillary’s inability to tell the truth and corrupt nature make her impossible to trust. But even now, after the election, Democrats still can’t get over bigotry accusations and their love of Globalism.

instagr